Firefox

20372 readers

159 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

105

Dear : Please stop saving images as webp when I drag them out of the browser. Forever stop that. Even if they are webp originally, just give me a setting to auto-convert them to JPEG. When I (mastodon.online)

submitted 1 year ago by MisterMoo@mastodon.online to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

98 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Dear @firefox : Please stop saving images as webp when I drag them out of the browser. Forever stop that. Even if they are webp originally, just give me a setting to auto-convert them to JPEG. When I get a webp file the first thing I have to do is convert it manually if I'm going to do *anything* with it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

webp is a great format though...

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Too bad so many platforms are not compatible with it. I am constantly having to convert the image type to post the image.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I am constantly having to convert the image type to post the image.

Try changing the file extension. Often the extension is checked but not if the file format matches the extension. All browsers read WebP just fine.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never had a problem on Linux

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Websites that do not recognize webp normally are fine when you run Linux?

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not really. It is better than shitty JPEG encoders but not really much better than good ones. It's lossless was fairly good but still barely worth it. Really we should chuck it for JPEG XL but Google is strong-arming it for unknown reasons.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

jpegxl should be the successor, granted - but that doesn't make webp any less good

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

No, but it also doesn't make it any good to start with.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Google is strong-arming it for unknown reasons.

lol. Yeah it’s a mystery.

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Exactly, great quality and small file sizes. Perfect to reduce web bloat, or loading times when using things like FoundryVTT