this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

ethfinance

0 readers
1 users here now

A community for investors, traders, users, developers, and others to discuss Ethereum and its cryptocurrency ETH. Join us on Discord, too! https://discord.gg/evmavericks

founded 2 years ago
 

Welcome to the Weekly General Discussion on Ethfinance

Massive List of Ethereum Links! - under construction
[Magazine Rules] - see sidebar
Discord - EV Mavericks
Twitter
Be awesome to one another and be sure to contribute the most high quality posts over on our sister magazines. Or guide them here for help and community, too!

Daily Doots Rich List - https://dailydoots.com/

community calendar: via Ethstaker https://ethstaker.cc/event-calendar/

"Find and post crypto jobs." https://cryptojobs.gg/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kingleo23@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nice investor report from BoA on digital assets.

Key takeaways:

  1. "TradFi" is in their abbreviations list.
  2. Eth's Market Value/Tx fees = 88, this is only beaten by Tron (8) which has had 163% increase in tx fees this year. I suspect this is related to whatever is going on with TUSD. Further down in the Defi section it's noted that 66% of Tron's defi TVL is in 1 application. Polkadot (16395) and Stellar (21652) rounding out the bottom on the Market value/tx fees metric.
  3. Arbitrum and Optimism leading the way (in percentage growth terms) for DeFi TVL with 223% and 198% respectively over the last 1 year. ETH TVL down 8% in that timeframe. I suspect much of that L2 growth is L1 migrations. Arb and Opt also have the lowest Mkt Cap/TVL metrics.
[–] hanniabu@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eth's Market Value/Tx fees = 88

What's the point of this metric? What can be inferred by it?

[–] kingleo23@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Just a way to look at the market cap relative to the protocol revenue via fees. Fees can be a surrogate for usage/utility/financial sustainability, and in cases like ETH, value accrual to the token via EIP1559 burn. A lower value there may suggest relative undervaluing of the token, whereas high values may indicate overvaluing. There's a lot of nuance that's not captured by that metric but I think it's an interesting data point.