this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)
Sysadmin
8109 readers
1 users here now
A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration
No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
From what I gathered from news articles it looks like they want more control over how and where you host and will be moving everything to subscription based licenses. So it somewhat makes sense to stop handing out the current licenses and offer new ones. Problem is that it doesn't seem to be clear which licenses you can get, which conditions apply to those, where and when you can get them,...
I think it would have been mostly fine if they had allowed for more ti.e to transition and had everything in place for the future. Then add some communication and there might have been a shitstorm, but not the mess that happened now...
I don't mind it with SaaS. Also for enterprise software, you used to pay for the license and then a support package, which basically is a subscription, on top. So there's nothing changing per se.
Problem for partners is, that they don't know whether they'll stay partners and whether they'll be accepted in the new program. If not, they cannot provide their SaaS solution to their customers.
Imagine your company gets a letter from its MSP that basically reads: "Hey, VMWare doesn't give us information about our way forward, we may be unable to continue to provide you with VMs. This happens to all partners, so no need to ask other MSPs, as those will tell you the same. We currently don't know how to proceed, but in three months all VMs that you have hosted with us might be toast and the only people who can tell you what to do are at broadcom and don't give out any information"