He is maybe somewhat more radical than a succdem at best. I just think it's pretty funny when he's right, or at least when he winds up looking good in hindsight.

[–] joseph@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Didnt't he get really mad about his writers trying to unionize a few years back or am I confusing him with someone else?

[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

I am hearing that that situation was very misrepresented and he's fine

[–] Chapo_is_Red@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

That's him. Libertarian socialist who got mad at the writers for his magazine trying organize because he believes the magazine needs an editorial line guided by his vision.

Being a magazine editor is the anarchist to Blanquist "I will make Stalin look like an anarchist" pipeline.