this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
24 points (96.2% liked)

ADHD

11604 readers
77 users here now

A casual community for people with ADHD

Values:

Acceptance, Openness, Understanding, Equality, Reciprocity.

Rules:

Encouraged:

Relevant Lemmy communities:

Autism

ADHD Memes

Bipolar Disorder

Therapy

Mental Health

Neurodivergent Life Hacks

lemmy.world/c/adhd will happily promote other ND communities as long as said communities demonstrate that they share our values.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I challenge something the other person said then they get upset and we start arguing. But then they change their position to agree with me. And claim to have held the same position as I do from the start.

So now I am the asshole for arguing when we agree on everything!!

Everybody has ADHD and I don't think it's on purpose. I just won the argument very thoroughly and this is what it looks like. I feel like I have to get a written record of what the other person is saying before I respond so they don't accuse me of starting an argument over literally nothing.

(And I have 3rd party witness who confirms my view of the situation is not skewed.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

I mean there is he dialectic. I have had arguments were as the person restates their meaning it sorta seems like we are saying the same thing but there is some nuance on language that we seem to be hung up on. Like it seems the idea is the same but we just can't rely on the appropriate language to express it. Its hard to describe because it only happens once in awhile and I will sometimes be like. You know we are sorta saying the same thing but oftentimes the person just gets more annoyed and will sorta double down on the language and usually I just give up at that point.

[–] work_towards@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

in this case we WERE disagreeing. but basically I was right so the other person changed their position. which is what I wanted, except then they immediately forget that they held the opposing position but we are still in an argument when that happens so it must be my fault for starting the argument over nothing.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You changed their mind. You won.

Wasn't that the point of the argument, or was the point for someone to shower you with congratulations?

Take the victory. You know what happened, and if the other person doesn't want to acknowledge it, you can't control that, so just remember what kind of person they are and move on.

[–] work_towards@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I know. but by that time everybody already feels bad and it's my fault because I raised the initial disagreement which now never existed in the first place. So I just stirred up the whole situation out of nothing apparently.

Since the actual issue is resolved, but everything is still escalated, then we just transition to arguing about who said what. Which is tiresome and pointless. And I am accused of lying when I am not. I don't like that and it's very difficult for me to deescalate.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I understand completely. I'm the same way. Just gotta let that shit go. It's only as important as you want it to be.

load more comments (3 replies)