this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
87 points (95.8% liked)

Canada

10141 readers
973 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New record ! Keep it up

Get wrecked PP

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree with this tactic. As much as it may hurt Poilievre (I doubt it, really), it will hurt Critchley at least as much.

The idea is to show the failings in our electoral system, but I don't see how it does that - and it plays into the hands of authoritarians who want to tightly vet the candidates appearing on a ballot.

If we had MMP voting, how would that stop enormous ballots from happening - other than encouraging the groups doing this to retire?

While I don't want to see the number of signatures to get on a ballot increased, I don't see a problem with requiring people to only sign on for one candidate.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not only do I not have an issue with someone signing for multiple candidate, I do not have a problem with hundreds of people on the ballot. Thousands.

Adding additional restrictions to candicy as a mechanism to preserve democracy is like fucking for virginity.

Secondly, it's nobodies fucking business who I vote for, or whom I want the future OPTION to vote for. Not yours and certainly not the fucking governments. None of your business if I even had an opinion.

Although I hate to make a slippery slope argument, this ends as "registering" as a Republican or Democrat.

This isn't a problem that requires solving, this is a feature.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

People know their candidate by heart they can gloss over the other names.