this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-44 points (42.5% liked)

/0 Governance

250 readers
12 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think you shouldn't conflate your conspiracy theories with facts and I also think you shouldn't sealion quite so much.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You seriously think Arbenz being deposed by a CIA backed coup is just a conspiracy theory? They declassified the documents confirming that they did it

Similarly, US covert intervention in Chile is well-known because of documents that the CIA itself also declassified.

So unless you're suggesting that the CIA is lying to make itself look bad, I think you're the one with poor epistemology and your process for finding truth is just contradicting everything the people you don't like say. Ironic, because if you at least applied that to the US State Department, at least you'd be right every now and then.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you should improve your reading comprehension and reiterate that nobody likes a sealion, nevermind one with bad reading comprehension

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said I'm conflating my conspiracy theories with facts. I am providing factual evidence for my "conspiracy theories." What part of that is poor reading comprehension? Because all the other instances of US meddling in foreign affairs I mentioned in my first comment also are backed by factual evidence.

The NED bankrolls the Hong Kong Human Rights Movement, the Hong Kong Journalists Association, the Civic Party, Labor Party and Democratic Party. They are members of the Civil Human Rights Front that coordinates the demonstrations.

I already stated in my first comment that I'm skeptical that the movements from the last couple years in Serbia, Turkey, and Bangladesh were color revolutions. Maybe they were, but I haven't seen concrete evidence beyond my knowledge of Radio Free Asia, Radio Free Europe, and Voice of America being active in those regions.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)