this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
1040 points (98.3% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1972 readers
33 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if that means that borrowers in the rest of the world have to pay a premium when they borrow money because the bank is taking a bigger risk.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i mean there's still a way to mark that someone isn't good at paying their bills. its just not a "score". it's yes or no.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, so if you're late once you're a "no"? That's gotta suck.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it lasts for five years i think. some places have a three-strikes system.

here, there's also a system that allows you to basically cancel your debt if it gets overwhelming. if you qualify, you can sign up to let the state take all the money you make above the level of minimum subsistence for five years, which they use to pay off your debt as far as possible, and after that the remaining debt is zeroed. there are a bunch of criteria, there basically has to be no way for you to pay it off by selling things, but it's there.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, you can basically declare bankruptcy? That's good.

Why is it you think a three strikes system is better than a score?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, your debts stay through a personal bankruptcy. this is different.

with a strike system, you're good until you're not. a score system means you can be rejected from some places and accepted at others, giving scummy lenders an in.

also, there's none of that "your score is low because you have nothing to pay off" nonsense.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No, the whole point of bankruptcy is that your debts are cancelled.

At the end of the process, your qualifying debts will be discharged, meaning you’ll no longer be responsible for them, so long as you satisfy the bankruptcy terms.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bankruptcy.asp

with a strike system, you're good until you're not.

How is that better?

a score system means you can be rejected from some places and accepted at others

And that's worse than being universally rejected? In reality, if you're completely shut off from credit, it will just encourage illegal loans from loansharks, etc.

also, there's none of that "your score is low because you have nothing to pay off" nonsense.

You don't have a history of dealing with debt, so they don't assign you the ultra-safe score. If another place doesn't have that, they'll simply have to charge a higher rate to everybody because they can't tell who is going to be good at handling debt and who isn't.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No, the whole point of bankruptcy is that your debts are cancelled.

no:

privatpersoner behåller sina skulder om de går i personlig konkurs.

with a strike system, you're good until you're not.

How is that better? [...] And that's worse than being universally rejected?

the answer was literally the sentence after the one you quoted.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
No, the whole point of bankruptcy is that your debts are cancelled.

no:

yes:

the answer was literally the sentence after the one you quoted.

No, it claimed without evidence that somehow a strike system prevented "scummy lenders", whereas the reality is that it would result in the scummiest lenders of all, loansharks.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

it would, and has not, resulted in significant proliferation of loan sharks. we hear far more about those from the us than locally.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Ah, so that's the only difference between the countries?