this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
592 points (97.0% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

3096 readers
889 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oyfrog@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (19 children)

I think the 9/11 attacks would've happened regardless.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Seriously. It was a failure of Intel sharing that would have always happened. Plus, the first WTC attack took place in 1993 while Clinton was in office. Gore just being there wouldn't have stopped that.

If anything, Gore winning would have 100% prevented any chance of a President Obama happening. I know which one I would have rather had.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If anything, Gore winning would have 100% prevented any chance of a President Obama happening.

President Obama not happening means him not roasting Trump at the 2011 correspondents dinner and Trump not deciding to run for president out of sheer humiliation, narcissism, spite, and stupidity, though.

Without that he'd been happy staying with his bankrupt casinos and TV gigs.

Between that and Gore actually doing something against climate change it'd probably have been a net positive.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

He's always had an interest, and had run before. And Putin would still want him as a puppet.

It's more likely than not that he would have run anyway. Maybe not. He is too fucking old.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)