this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)

Actual Discussion

889 readers
3 users here now

Are you tired of going into controversial threads and having people not discuss things, circlejerking, or using emotional responses in place of logic? Us too.

Welcome to Actual Discussion!

DO:

DO NOT:

For more casual conversation instead of competitive ranked conversation, try: !casualconversation@piefed.social

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. We try to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are highly encouraged as no-discussion downvotes don't help anyone learn anything valuable. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

We’re back! Instead of putting a neutral topic in the introduction, I'm placing a bit of opinion on an issue to see if it helps spur discussion. We are also actively seeking moderators and people who enjoy discussion (and understand that being wrong is an important part of being a better person)! Send me a message if you’d like to help out.

This week, I'd like to discuss something that's been a bit of an issue for me personally.

Lemmy (and Reddit before it) appears to have a problem with overly-aggressive bannings for perceived slights. In the topic linked above there were people permanently banning users from multiple communities (any they moderate - dozens in some cases) for single downvotes, 4 downvotes across a ten-month period, and bannings because a moderator thought they maybe sorta kinda read that a user may have had a negative thought about their pet issue.

I've personally been banned from Communities (and sent some pretty vile PMs) for posting in our weekly threads here playing devil's advocate where I state hard questions that I do not necessarily feel are correct. They think they've discovered some secret agenda by finding posts I've made here and use them as "receipts" in order to dismiss anything they think they're reading that may be contrary to their opinion. Any context provided for the post falls on deaf ears.

I'm someone who operates on the idea of "If you can not defend an opinion from scrutiny, you should probably not hold that opinion."

To quote myself:

It’s pretty tragic that people can't handle opposing opinions. I think the activist nature of Lemmy is kind of a self-destructive spiral and people need to learn how to live with each other again. But I guess that’s the issue with modern social media as a whole… Nobody has any idea how to convince anyone else, only to yell at them louder.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Are niche Communities correct for banning anyone who downvotes?
  • Do downvotes represent a "disagree" button for you (this Community notwithstanding)?
  • Most importantly, what would it take to change this?
  • Does it help build the Community? What about the platform as a whole?
  • Is there a way to build a "safe space" without building an echo chamber online? Is that even a valuable thing to build?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

(WEEKLY) Lemmy's Aggressive Banning Issue

I Comment - https://lemmy.world/modlog?commentId=18282336

Removed by mod

MFW

Mods should always take a light approach to modding and not think they're the true defenders of (their perceived) true faith. That's the problem with stack overflow, lemmy (that I'm now stepping away from in part for this reason and also the amount of insane people running the zoo), reddit. Oh, this is actual discussion that's provocative. Maybe i should stop.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I didn't remove it and I'm the only Mod here. WTF.

Ah. Looks like it was an admin... Well, that's not generally how I work here unless you're breaking a rule, and our rules are conversation-focused. I dunno what the etiquette for restoring it would be or if it would just be me pissing off an Admin which is probably not smart.

[–] catty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I'm starting to think lemmy is a socialist experiment with bots to manipulate/radicalise people. A watered-down rt.com or sputnikglobe.com - access to which have been blocked in my country, but I guess, by having multiple websites with the news disguised as chat platforms would make it harder for countries to block. (Not that I agree with blocking them in the first place...)

Over zealous moderation behaviour is exactly how stack overflow quickly went downhill causing people to leave in their droves.

Also, you need to update the community blurb on the right - it refers to casual conversation at lemm.ee

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Heh. I'm Canadian; I've got zero issues with socialism. Safety nets have helped me at various points in my life and many of my friends as well that, in the US system, would have been destroyed for their entire lives.

Updated the link in the side panel, thanks!

[–] catty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's nice that a community has started for 'actual' conversation - many people (bots esp) can't handle opposing opinions - but it seems that if admins are going to step in (.ca admins?) then, it unfortunately defeats the whole purpose of the community.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

First time I've ever seen it happen when it wasn't explicitly spam or obvious trolling. I'm more confused about it than anything.