this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)
Actual Discussion
889 readers
3 users here now
Are you tired of going into controversial threads and having people not discuss things, circlejerking, or using emotional responses in place of logic? Us too.
Welcome to Actual Discussion!
DO:
- Be civil. This doesn't mean you shouldn't challenge people, just don't be a dick.
- Upvote interesting or well-articulated points, even if you may not agree.
- Be prepared to back up any claims you make with an unbiased source.
- Be willing to be wrong and append your initial post to show a changed view.
- Admit when you are incorrect or spoke poorly. Upvote when you see others correct themselves or change their mind.
- Feel free to be a "Devil's Advocate". You do not have to believe either side of an issue in order to generate solid points.
- Discuss hot-button issues.
- Add humour, and be creative! Dry writing isn't super fun to read or discuss.
DO NOT:
- Call people names or label people. We fight ideas, not people here.
- Ask for sources, and then not respond to the person providing them.
- Mindlessly downvote people you disagree with. We only downvote people that do not add to the discussion.
- Be a bot, spam, or engage in self-promotion.
- Duplicate posts from within the last month unless new information is surfaced on the topic.
- Strawman.
- Expect that personal experience or morals are a substitute for proof.
- Exaggerate. Not everyone slightly to the right of you is a Nazi, and not everyone left of you is a Tankie.
- Copy an entire article in your post body. It's just messy. Link to it, summarize, and add your thoughts.
For more casual conversation instead of competitive ranked conversation, try: !casualconversation@piefed.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
MFW
Mods should always take a light approach to modding and not think they're the true defenders of (their perceived) true faith. That's the problem with stack overflow, lemmy (that I'm now stepping away from in part for this reason and also the amount of insane people running the zoo), reddit. Oh, this is actual discussion that's provocative. Maybe i should stop.
I didn't remove it and I'm the only Mod here. WTF.
Ah. Looks like it was an admin... Well, that's not generally how I work here unless you're breaking a rule, and our rules are conversation-focused. I dunno what the etiquette for restoring it would be or if it would just be me pissing off an Admin which is probably not smart.
Yeah, I'm starting to think lemmy is a socialist experiment with bots to manipulate/radicalise people. A watered-down rt.com or sputnikglobe.com - access to which have been blocked in my country, but I guess, by having multiple websites with the news disguised as chat platforms would make it harder for countries to block. (Not that I agree with blocking them in the first place...)
Over zealous moderation behaviour is exactly how stack overflow quickly went downhill causing people to leave in their droves.
Also, you need to update the community blurb on the right - it refers to casual conversation at lemm.ee
Heh. I'm Canadian; I've got zero issues with socialism. Safety nets have helped me at various points in my life and many of my friends as well that, in the US system, would have been destroyed for their entire lives.
Updated the link in the side panel, thanks!
It's nice that a community has started for 'actual' conversation - many people (bots esp) can't handle opposing opinions - but it seems that if admins are going to step in (.ca admins?) then, it unfortunately defeats the whole purpose of the community.
First time I've ever seen it happen when it wasn't explicitly spam or obvious trolling. I'm more confused about it than anything.