this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
122 points (95.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13937 readers
689 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Death to America

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Suburb brain comes from an old england-cool tradition of flexing on the poors by having land that was not used to grow food. I am not kidding. That was the flex.

[–] wtypstanaccount04@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The idea of American suburbs is that everyone (read: settlers) will live like royalty. You will have your own horse and buggy (SUV), and you will be so wealthy that your land is simply used to grow grass, as a flex. It is a celebration of excess.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The worst thing about lawns is that they are like castles or villas by the sea: luxury goods invented for the exclusive pleasure of a very rich minority, and which in conception and nature were never intended for the people.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As soon as a person/consumer acquires a lawn, their demand for lawns jumps to a higher level, and the more of other people's lawns that are around, the more diluted the value of one's own lawn becomes; the economy functionally cannot meet the demand for people having a lawn.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Begun, the lawn wars have.

God I remember my uncle's lawn-feud with his neighbor, them constantly trying to one-up each other with nicer lawns. Pathetic.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

yeah but oaks dont grow food either, they could plant oaks. they're trees. they're amazing. more trees.

it would provide shade in the summer, lowering the AC bills. for fuck's sake.

[–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

even when any other food is available? for people? really? i guess...

[–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Iirc they were a staple crop for native people in the Americas. I've never tried to eat them, though!

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have, I can’t say I would eat them again by choice

[–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago
[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

I think it was first (or at least equally) a flex by france-cool , and quickly spread from there.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

it's even worse. the front yards are totally open, no fence or hedge, so they're 100% unusable. i'll never understand why americans dont put a fence across their front yard.

unless it's to hide the fact that the public land their roads are on arent wide enough to have a reasonable sized road and on both sides, a verge of trees, a sidewalk and another verge of trees (this could be in the private front yards of the houses).

[–] D61@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Landlords don't like pets, put a fence around a rental property and your asking for a renter to find a dog to keep in the fenced area.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago
[–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 11 months ago

It's often against city code to put a fence into your front yard.

Which is, of course, stupid.