this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
335 points (98.8% liked)

Firefox

20363 readers
11 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

yea, but that gives you less info

this way, you can’t really differentiate from a feature that people want, but not as a priority, VS a feature that people don’t want ever

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

And there's no way to relate preference between features, at least in my case. I had one question that I entered "2x faster performance" as most want, and the next question was "2x slower performance," but there was another crappy option in the same list that I also don't want, so if I don't pick "2x slower performance" as least want, what signal does that send?

I hope it all comes out in the wash, but honestly, I would've preferred a big list of all of the features with 4 options:

  • really want
  • want
  • meh
  • don't want

I think I would've entered about even numbers of things for each category. They could even limit "really want" to top three or something.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

It makes the survey easier to complete by users in small steps. Huge surveys scare users away.